The New International Division of Labor
In: Journal of peace research, Band 15, Heft 3
ISSN: 0022-3433
1443491 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of peace research, Band 15, Heft 3
ISSN: 0022-3433
In: Journal of development economics, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 156-158
ISSN: 0304-3878
In: MERIP reports: Middle East research & information project, Heft 94, S. 28
In: Problems of economics, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 44-50
In: Problems of economics: selected articles from Soviet economics journals in English translation, Band 3, S. 44-50
ISSN: 0032-9436
In: International political economy yearbook 2
In: Review of International Economics, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 322-338
SSRN
In: Sustainable Geography, S. 117-124
In: Mirovaja ėkonomika i meždunarodnye otnošenija: MĖMO, Heft 5, S. 31-40
The article considers the proportions of mutual deliveries of goods in the triangle USA – Western Europe – East Asia in the recent decade. It is shown that the USA remained to be a net importer of industrial products while West European and East Asian countries were the net providers. The US deficit in goods' trade with China and Germany exceeded the pre-crisis level. Still, the integral trade deficit of the USA remained lower than before the crisis, in particular because of lesser deficit in trade with oil producing countries and Japan. Reduction of China's and Eurozone countries' surplus in comparison to 2007-2008 can be explained by the dynamics of their trade with third countries (in particular, with the suppliers of energy resources which the prices turned back to high levels in post-crisis period). The same relate to a lesser extent to Japan which the surplus in trade with the USA did not reach the pre-crisis level. The author concludes that even during crisis and post-crisis periods the changes in balance of payments of the leading suppliers of mechanical engineering goods were mostly determined by their trade with the suppliers of raw materials rather than by the mutual trade.
In: Journal of sport and social issues: the official journal of Northeastern University's Center for the Study of Sport in Society, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 323-326
ISSN: 1552-7638
In: World Economy and International Relations, Heft 9, S. 5-19
In: World Economy and International Relations, Heft 12, S. 100-109
In: Eastern European economics: EEE, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 3-15
ISSN: 1557-9298
In: Journal of political economy, Band 107, Heft 6, S. 1127
ISSN: 0022-3808
In: Polity: the journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 499-531
ISSN: 0032-3497
Since contending methodological perspectives & different types of research products are founded on irreconcilable philosophical assumptions, the sharp, recurrent debates over social science research methods are likely to be fruitless & counterproductive. This article begins by exposing some of the philosophical assumptions underlying the most recent calls for a unified social science methodology & seeks to help develop a common appreciation of how different kinds of methods & research products advance our understanding of different aspects of social life at different levels of abstraction. Such commonly posited dichotomies as deductivist/inductivist logic, quantitative/quantitative analysis, & nomothetic/idiographic research products are shown to obscure significant differences along a continuum of strategies through which context-bound information & analytic constructs are combined to produce interpretations of varying degrees of complexity or generality. Durkheim's conception of "organic solidarity" in a social "division of labor" serves as a useful metaphor here to capture the complementary roles performed by various research products as well as the trade-offs arising from the strengths & weaknesses of various methodological approaches (ranging from formal & statistical approaches to various case-based & interpretive approaches). Thus, sharp claims regarding the strengths & limitations of particular methods are transformed into elements of an overarching agnostic understanding of the trade-offs & complementarities among these methods. Finally, a distinctive role is identified for an ideal-typical "middle-range" comparative-historical approach in fostering greater communication among a more inclusively defined community of methodologically diverse social scientists. 2 Figures. Adapted from the source document.